Implementing standardized diversity, equity, and inclusion approaches within scientific communities.

This article discusses how diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in science vary widely across countries due to differences in history, politics, and culture—and how this inconsistency perpetuates inequality in academia. The authors highlight how DEI policies in the U.S. evolved from the Civil Rights Act and affirmative action, while European efforts—such as Athena Swan and gender equality offices—stem from post–World War II responses to discrimination but often focus narrowly on gender because collecting demographic data is restricted. They propose a standardized global DEI framework that institutions can adapt locally, emphasizing early STEM exposure for underrepresented groups, better recruitment and training to reduce bias, transparent data collection, and continual assessment of outcomes. The authors argue that consistent, evidence-based DEI practices are essential to build inclusive, equitable scientific communities worldwide and to ensure that leadership, funding, and recognition reflect the diversity of society.