Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells.

In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim
Publication Year: 
Veronika Akopian
Peter W Andrews
Stephen Beil
Nissim Benvenisty
Jennifer Brehm
Megan Christie
Angela Ford
Victoria Fox
Paul J Gokhale
Lyn Healy
Frida Holm
Outi Hovatta
Barbara B Knowles
Tenneille E Ludwig
Ronald D G McKay
Takamichi Miyazaki
Norio Nakatsuji
Steve K W Oh
Martin F Pera
Janet Rossant
Glyn N Stacey
Hirofumi Suemori
PubMed link: 
Public Summary: 
A major goal of human stem cell research has been the development of defined media free of animal products for use in research and future therapeutic applications. An international consortium of laboratories studied fully defined culture medium for the ability to support growth of human pluripotent stem cells. Many published media formulations were not robust enough to support the growth of a panel of stme cell lines. Two commercially available media worked well in most assays in most laboratories.
Scientific Abstract: 
There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.