Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.

Return to Grants

Publication Year:
2016
Authors:
PubMed ID:
26682505
Public Summary:
More than 1800 gene therapy clinical trials worldwide have targeted a wide range of conditions including cancer, heart diseases, and genetic diseases. Biological (i.e. viral), chemical, and physical approaches have been developed to deliver genes into cells. Although viruses offer the greatest efficiency, they also raise major safety concerns including cancer and inflammation. A safer alternative is the use of ultrasound together with small bubbles (micro bubbles) that enhance the uptake of drugs and genes into cells by disrupting the cell membrane in a reversible way. We hypothesized that ultrasound could be used to guide local microbubble-enhanced delivery of DNA. In the study we tested various parameters of ultrasound force, concentration of DNA, number of treatments and more in order to establish the optimal methodology for gene delivery. Our findings defined certain parameters that showed the highest gene delivery efficiency without damaging the tissue.
Scientific Abstract:
More than 1800 gene therapy clinical trials worldwide have targeted a wide range of conditions including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and monogenic diseases. Biological (i.e. viral), chemical, and physical approaches have been developed to deliver nucleic acids into cells. Although viral vectors offer the greatest efficiency, they also raise major safety concerns including carcinogenesis and immunogenicity. The goal of microbubble-mediated sonoporation is to enhance the uptake of drugs and nucleic acids. Insonation of microbubbles is thought to facilitate two mechanisms for enhanced uptake: first, deflection of the cell membrane inducing endocytotic uptake, and second, microbubble jetting inducing the formation of pores in the cell membrane. We hypothesized that ultrasound could be used to guide local microbubble-enhanced sonoporation of plasmid DNA. With the aim of optimizing delivery efficiency, we used nonlinear ultrasound and bioluminescence imaging to optimize the acoustic pressure, microbubble concentration, treatment duration, DNA dosage, and number of treatments required for in vivo Luciferase gene expression in a mouse thigh muscle model. We found that mice injected with 50mug luciferase plasmid DNA and 5x10(5) microbubbles followed by ultrasound treatment at 1.4MHz, 200kPa, 100-cycle pulse length, and 540 Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF) for 2min exhibited superior transgene expression compared to all other treatment groups. The bioluminescent signal measured for these mice on Day 4 post-treatment was 100-fold higher (p<0.0001, n=5 or 6) than the signals for controls treated with DNA injection alone, DNA and microbubble injection, or DNA injection and ultrasound treatment. Our results indicate that these conditions result in efficient gene delivery and prolonged gene expression (up to 21days) with no evidence of tissue damage or off-target delivery. We believe that these promising results bear great promise for the development of microbubble-enhanced sonoporation-induced gene therapies.